Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Svetlana Prokhorova, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Angeliki Kasimis
March 21, 2013
SVETLANA PROKHOROVA, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
ANGELIKI KASIMIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on March 21, 2013 Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered September 26, 2011, which, inter alia, granted defendant the City's motion to deem it in compliance with a prior order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Having certified that discovery was complete, plaintiffs are barred from challenging the motion court's determination that the City fully complied with the March 24, 2011 order by producing two knowledgeable witnesses (see Bookazine Co. v J & A Bindery, 61 AD2d 919, 919 [1st Dept 1978]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...