Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Victoria M. Argento, J.), rendered October 6, 2011.
Released on March 22, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
The judgment convicted defendant, upon a non-jury verdict, of reckless endangerment in the first degree , criminal mischief in the fourth degree, intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree, criminal contempt in the first degree and menacing in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a non-jury verdict of reckless endangerment in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.25), criminal mischief in the fourth degree (§ 145.00 ), intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree (§ 215.15 ), criminal contempt in the first degree (§ 215.51 [b] [i]) and menacing in the second degree (§ 120.14 ), defendant contends that the conviction of reckless endangerment and criminal mischief is not supported by legally sufficient evidence. Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review inasmuch as he failed to renew his motion for a trial order of dismissal after presenting evidence (see People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 61, rearg denied 97 NY2d 678). In any event, that contention lacks merit (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Further, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of those crimes as well as the crime of menacing in the second degree in this non-jury trial (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence with respect to those crimes (see generally Bleakley, 69 NY2d at 495).
Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...