Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jerry Maurice v. Eulen America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


March 28, 2013

JERRY MAURICE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EULEN AMERICA,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States District Judge:

ORDER AND CIVIL JUDGMENT

On December 21, 2012, plaintiff Jerry Maurice filed this pro se complaint pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as codified at 42 U.S.C. § § 2000e - 2000e-17 ("Title VII"). (Doc. No. 1.) By Order dated January 3, 2013, the Court granted plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of the Order to file an amended complaint which complies with Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 4.) Plaintiff was advised that if he failed to comply with the Court's January 3, 2013 Order within the time allowed, the case would be dismissed.*fn1

Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's January 3, 2013 Order.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: that the action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff, and to close the file.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED.

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.