Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bishop Frank Best v. A.C.S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


April 8, 2013

BISHOP FRANK BEST, PLAINTIFF,
v.
A.C.S., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sarah Netburn, United States Magistrate Judge:

OPINION AND ORDER

On April 5, 2013, pro se plaintiff Bishop Frank Best filed an amended complaint pursuant to the Court's March 21, 2013 Order. After reviewing the amended complaint, the Court believes that Best's filing is more properly understood as a supplemental pleading brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d). Thus, if defendants move to dismiss Best's case, they should address the October 22, 2012 complaint, (Docket Number ("Doc. No.") 2), and any pleadings in the April 5, 2013 filing, (Doc No. 49), that supplement the complaint.

The Clerk of Court is directed to alter Doc. No. 49 to reflect that it is a Supplemental Pleading, and not an Amended Complaint.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: New York April 8, 2013

cc: Bishop Frank Best 131-19 Farmers Blvd Queens, NY 11434

20130408

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.