Armienti, DeBellis, Guglielmo & Rhoden, LLP, New York (Vanessa M. Corchia of counsel), for appellants.
Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.
Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman, Gische, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered May 26, 2011, after a jury trial, awarding plaintiff $100, 000 for past pain and suffering and $250, 000 for future pain and suffering over 29 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The jury's finding that plaintiff sustained a significant limitation of use and permanent consequential limitation of use of a body function or system (see Insurance Law § 5102[d]) is not against the weight of the evidence (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499 ; Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 132-133 [2d Dept 1985]). The jury award is not excessive (see Sow v Arias, 21 A.D.3d 317 [1st Dept 2005), lv denied5 N.Y.3d 716 ; Rountree v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 261 A.D.2d 324 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied94 N.Y.2d 754 ; Adams v Romero, 227 A.D.2d ...