Buckley Law Group, P.A., New York (Michael B. Buckley of counsel), for appellant.
Levy Sonet & Siegel, LLP, New York (Steven G. Sonet of counsel), for respondent.
Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Richter, Feinman, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered March 23, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the fourth and fifth causes of action, for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Choses in action, such as claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, are freely assignable (General Obligations Law § 13-101; see M. W. Zack Metal Co. v International Nav. Corp. of Monrovia, 112 A.D.2d 865, 867 [1st Dept 1985], affd67 N.Y.2d 892 ; Hill Intl. v Town of Orangetown, 290 A.D.2d 416, 417 [2d Dept 2002]; American Banana Co. v Venezolana Internacional De Aviacion S.A. [VIASA], 67 A.D.2d 613 [1st Dept 1979], affd49 N.Y.2d 848 ). While, generally speaking, an assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor (see New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 17 N.Y.3d 586, 592 ), the plain language of an assignment determines its breadth and scope (see CIT Group/Equip. Fin. v Abele Tractor & Equip. Co., 213 A.D.2d 820, 821 [3d Dept 1995]; see also 29 Richard A. Lord, Williston on Contracts § 74:6 [4th ed 2012]). Here, the subject assignment provided that plaintiff would assume "all of [the Assignor]'s liabilities and obligations with respect to the Membership Interest" in a limited liability corporation, and " assume[d] all obligations of the Assignor arising from any failure to make a ...