Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brown Harris Stevens Westhampton LLC v. Gerber

Supreme Court of New York, First Department

June 18, 2013

Brown Harris Stevens Westhampton LLC, Index Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kelly Gerber, Defendant-Respondent.

Penn Proefriedt Schwarzfeld & Schwartz, New York (Neal Schwarzfeld of counsel), for appellant.

Crowell & Moring LLP, New York (Alan B. Howard of counsel), for respondent.

Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Feinman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered December 4, 2012, which denied plaintiff's motion for, among other things, summary judgment on its claim for a real estate commission, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly denied plaintiff's second successive motion for summary judgment, since plaintiff failed to offer any newly discovered evidence or demonstrate other sufficient cause for making the second motion (see 11 Essex St. Corp. v Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y., 81 A.D.3d 516, 517 [1st Dept 2011]). Defendant's deposition testimony, although not available at the time of the first motion, did not yield such new evidence as to warrant consideration of the second motion (see Pavlovich v Zimmet, 50 A.D.3d 1364, 1365 [3d Dept 2008]). Furthermore, the document production, consisting of a series of emails between the parties and the proposed and final listing agreements, does not constitute new evidence, since they were available to the parties at the time of the first motion (see id.), and were extensively relied upon by the parties during oral argument of that motion.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.