Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Andrade v. Geiger Const. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New York, New York County

August 12, 2013

Leocadio ANDRADE, Plaintiff,
v.
GEIGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Perimter Bridge & Scaffold Co., Inc., 498 Seventh LLC, New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Defendants. No. 108945/2011.

Editorial Note:

This decision has been referenced in a table in the New York Supplement.

Shapiro Law Offices, PLLC by Jason S. Shapiro, Esq., Bronx, for plaintiff.

Newman Myers Kreines Gross Harris PC by Ian B. Forman, New York, for Geiger Construction Co., Inc.

MICHAEL D. STALLMAN, J.

Defendant/third-party defendant Geiger Construction, Inc. moves to strike the complaint due to plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery, or in the alternative, to compel plaintiff to comply with prior so-ordered stipulations from discovery conferences and with five notices for discovery and inspection. Geiger Construction Co., Inc. also seeks an order compelling defendant/third-party plaintiff, 498 Seventh LLC, to supply all outstanding discovery. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

BACKGROUND

In this action, plaintiff alleges that, on May 7, 2010, he was injured while he was erecting sidewalk scaffolding at 498 Seventh Avenue in Manhattan. According to the complaint, a bus came into contact with the plaintiff. The complaint asserts causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law ยงยง 200, 240 and 241, and common-law negligence.

On June 27, 2012, defendant 498 Seventh LLC commenced a third-party action against Geiger Construction Co., Inc. (Geiger Construction). (Forman Affirm., Ex B.) After Geiger Construction answered the third-party complaint, plaintiff apparently filed a supplemental summons and amended verified complaint on July 18, 2012, naming Geiger Construction as a direct defendant. (Forman Affirm., Ex D.) Geiger Construction served upon plaintiff a notice for discovery inspection dated September 24, 2012, which demanded, among other things, " Copies of all prior pleadings and Bills of Particulars served in this action" and all discovery demands and responses that were previously served. (Forman Affirm., Ex E.)

At a discovery conference on December 13, 2012, the parties stipulated, among other things, that " AND 498 TO PROVIDE GEIGER WITH COPIES OF PREVIOUSLY EXCHANGED DISCOVERY W/I 30 DAYS." (Forman Affirm., Ex F.) The December 13, 2012 stipulation also stated, in pertinent part:

" (3) to provide TA with Affidavit or some form of written proof indicating that uses both the last name of Andrade' and Andrade-Rosas' within 30 days. (with copy to all As)
(4) to provide TA with copies of medical reports current authorizations to obtain medical records/reports w/in 30 days (copies MD2 to all As)
(5) to provide copies of any accident reports or line of duty injury reports, if any, within 30 days.
(6) to provide authorizations for workers comp file/workers comp board, employment W-2's for 2006 to date, within 30 days, if not already provided."

(Id.)

During this time, Fischetti & Pesce LLP was Geiger Construction's counsel of record. Newman Myers Kreins Gross Harris, P.C. was later substituted as Geiger Construction's counsel, and a notice of substitution of counsel was filed with the court on March 22, 2012.

Geiger Construction's new counsel served upon plaintiff three different notices for discovery and inspection each dated March 25, 2013 (Forman Affirm., Exs G, H, I), and a notice for discovery and inspection dated April 10, 2013. (Forman Affirm., Ex J.)

At the next discovery conference on April 11, 2013, the parties again agreed, among other things, " As per prior order, [plaintiff] AND 498 Seventh are to provide Geiger with copies of all previously exchanged pleadings, discovery demands & discovery responses, etc. as per Geiger's demands within 14 days, to the extent not already provided." (Forman Affirm., Ex K.) The stipulation also provided,

" [plaintiff] is to provide responses to Geiger's demands for discovery w/in 30 days, including (1) Further ND & I re: prior injury dated 3/25/13, (2) Demand for Medicare/Medicaid and Disability Info. dated 3/25/13, (3) ND & I on Special Damages dated 3/25/13 and (4) ND & I and Further Demand for ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.