Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

People v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of New York

August 27, 2013

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent,
v.
Julio RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.

Page 1031

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Lisa A. Packard of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Patricia Curran of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he did not receive 20 days notice prior to his sex offender designation proceeding as required under Correction Law ยง 168-n (3). His argument

Page 1032

that an adjournment of unspecified duration was required as a matter of due process is similarly unreviewable.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS-SALAAM concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.