Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered July 23, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts).
MICHAEL J. STACHOWSKI, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. STACHOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 ). Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in enhancing his sentence without affording him the opportunity to withdraw his plea (see People v Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 241, cert denied419 U.S. 1122) and that his waiver of the right to appeal does not foreclose him from raising that contention. We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his contention regarding the alleged enhanced sentence (see People v Joyner, 19 A.D.3d 1129, 1129; People v Lighthall, 6 A.D.3d 1170, 1171, lv denied3 N.Y.3d 643). Defendant, however, failed to preserve that contention for our review because he failed to object to the alleged enhanced sentence and did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction on ...