Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Adams v. Back

United States District Court, Second Circuit

October 18, 2013

JOEY ADAMS, Plaintiff,
v.
JONATHAN BACK, Defendant.

JOEY ADAMS Plaintiff pro se Los Angeles, CA.

DECISION and ORDER

DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Joey Adams brought this action asserting state law breach of contract and fraud claims against defendant Jonathan Back. On September 17, 2013, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and that plaintiff be granted leave to file an amended complaint. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1).

Therefore it is

ORDERED that

Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction unless, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order, plaintiff files an amended complaint satisfying the jurisdictional requirements identified in the Report-Recommendation.

The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.