Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Schatzki v. Weiser Capital Management, LLC

United States District Court, Second Circuit

November 26, 2013

DEBRA SCHATZKI and BPP WEALTH, INC., Plaintiffs,
v.
WEISER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, WEISERMAZARS, LLP and HOITSZ (A/K/A

Albert K. Lawler, Esq., Christopher S. Rooney, Esq., James J. Mahon, Esq., LAWLER MAHON & ROONEY LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Scott I. Unger, Esq., STARK & STARK, P.C., Lawrenceville, NJ, Attorneys for Defendants.

OPINION

ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Debra Schatzki ("Schatzki") and BPP Wealth, Inc. ("BPP") (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") have moved pursuant to the inherent power of this Court and Rule 3.7(b)(1) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, to disqualify the law firm of Stark & Stark, P.C. from acting as trial counsel for the Defendants in this action upon the ground that Thomas Giachetti ("Giachetti"), a shareholder in the said firm whom both Plaintiffs and Defendants have named as a witness in the Joint Pre-Trial Order, will be compelled to give testimony that is prejudicial to the Defendants at the trial, and precluding Giachetti from giving any testimony about Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-P (17 C.F.R. Part 248) and/or its application to this case.

The defendants Weiser Capital Management, LLC ("WCM"), Weisermazars LLP ("W") and Hoitsz Michel ("Michel") (collectively, the "Defendants") have moved for sanctions against the Plaintiffs under Rule 11 of the Fed. R. Civ. P.

As set forth below, the motion to disqualify Stark & Stark is denied, and any testimony by Giachetti, if any, will be limited to facts within his knowledge. The Defendants' motion for sanctions is denied.

Prior Proceedings

This hard-fought litigation was initiated by the Plaintiffs on June 16, 2010 in which the Defendants, after terminating their agreements, misappropriated property belonging to the Plaintiffs. Discovery has been completed, a pretrial order filed and except for pretrial motions, and the action is trial ready.

On March 26, 2012, Giachetti's deposition was taken. He testified with respect to the events giving rise to this action.

On September 19, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a "Motion to Strike Defendants' Answer" pursuant to the inherent powers of the Court. The motion was denied by memo and order of January 14, 2013. Pursuant to the Revised Stipulation and Scheduling Order, discovery was to end on April 1, 2013 and the parties were to submit to the Court trial briefs, a joint proposed trial order, and if applicable motions in limine, jury charges, voir dire requests or a special verdict form by June 7, 2013, or on such other date as directed by the Court. Subsequent to the entry of the Final Pretrial Order, the parties agreed to try to mediate and agreed to a mediation date of Friday, July 26, 2013. Two days prior to the mediation, Plaintiffs filed the instant application.

Disqualification is Denied

Rule 3.7(b) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct governs. The rule states that:

(b) A lawyer may not act as advocate before a tribunal in a matter if:
(1) another lawyer in the lawyer's firm is likely to be called as a witness on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.