BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. Petitioner,
PANDORA MEDIA, INC., Respondent, SONY/ATV MUSIC PUBLISHING LLC, EMI MUSIC PUBLISHING, UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC. Intervenors.
OPINION & ORDER
LOUIS L. STANTON, District Judge.
This case grows out of a series of "withdrawals" of digital rights, by music publishers affiliated with Broadcast Music Inc ("BMI") from Pandora Media, Inc. ("Pandora") and other "New Media Services." BMI's petition seeks an order exercising the Court's rate-setting authority under article XIV of the BMI Consent Decree, setting reasonable music license terms and fees after giving effect to the withdrawals, for performances of the remainder of the compositions in BMI's repertory.
Moving for partial summary judgment, Pandora argues that the withdrawals are ineffectual, because the antitrust consent decree under which BMI operates requires BMI to offer a license to Pandora to perform all of the compositions in the BMI repertory as of January 1, 2013, despite the fact that certain music publishers have by agreement with BMI withdrawn from BMI the right to license their compositions to so-called "New Media Services" such as Pandora.
However, the BMI Consent Decree requires BMI to offer Pandora a license to perform all of the compositions in its repertory. When BMI no longer is authorized by music publisher copyright holders to license their compositions to Pandora and New Media Services, those compositions are no longer eligible for inclusion in BMI's repertory. BMI can no longer license them to Pandora or any other applicant.
Accordingly, Pandora's motion for summary judgment is denied.
BMI is a non-profit performing rights organization ("PRO") that licenses non-exclusive rights of public performance to a variety of music users on behalf of affiliates who are the music compositions' copyright holders. BMI's affiliates comprise approximately 600, 000 composers, songwriters and music publishers, and BMI's repertory consists of approximately approximately 7.5 million musical compositions.
Pandora is a streaming internet radio service that plays music compositions licensed directly from their copyright holders, or through BMI and other PROs.
A. THE BMI CONSENT DECREE
BMI's ability to license the public performance rights of its musical repertory is governed by the Consent Decree settling this antitrust suit brought by the United States. An amendment to the BMI Consent Decree establishes this Court as a "rate court, " which sets fees for licenses when BMI and applicants cannot agree on a reasonable fee. BMI Consent Decree Art. XIII. The Decree also imposes certain conditions and requirements on BMI's issuance of licenses.
Section VII(B) of the BMI Consent Decree states in relevant part: "Defendant shall, upon the request of any unlicensed broadcaster, license the rights publicly to perform its repertory by broadcasting on either a per program or per programming period basis, at defendant's option."
Section IX(C) of the BMI Consent Decree states:
Defendant shall not, in connection with any offer to license by it the public performance of musical compositions by music users other than broadcasters, refuse to offer a license at a price or prices to be fixed by defendant with the consent of the copyright proprietor for the performance of such specific (i.e., per piece) musical compositions, the use of which shall be requested by the prospective licensee.
Although not explicitly mentioned in the BMI Consent Decree, "Traditionally, the BMI's license of choice has been a 'blanket license, ' a license that grants the licensee access to BMI's entire repertory in exchange for an annual fee." United States v. Broadcast Music, Inc. , 275 F.3d 168, 172 (2d Cir. 2001). As defined by Section II(C) of the BMI Consent Decree, "Defendant's repertory' means those compositions, the right of public performance ...