United States District Court, S.D. New York
RICHARD P. HOBBS, Plaintiff,
POLICE OFFICERS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY PITMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Richard P. Hobbs has filed seven purported cross-motions (Docket Items 74, 76, 77, 79-81 and 84) in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment, dated June 26, 2013 (Docket Item 67)). The New York City Police Department, former Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, the New York City Council Members and the City of New York oppose plaintiff's cross-motions on various grounds (Reply Memorandum of Law, dated July 19, 2013 (Docket Item 88)).
For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff's motions docketed as items 74, 76, 79-81 and 84 are denied and docket item 77 is granted for a limited purpose.
The facts giving rise to this action are set forth in my Report and Recommendation of even date, familiarity with which is assumed.
B. Present Motions
In response to defendants' notice of motion for summary judgment, plaintiff filed the following cross-motions:
1. Statement of Plaintiff to Preserve Right to Submit a Second Amended Complaint, dated July 2, 2013 (Docket Item 74);
2. Motion for Hearing to Have Oral Argument, dated July 9, 2013 (Docket Item 76);
3. Motion for Court to Recognize Self Sworn Testimony of George Ciceron as an Affidavit in Support of Plaintiff's Claims, dated July 9, 2013 (Docket Item 77);
4. Motion for Court to Recognize as Depositions all Documents Submitted by Plaintiff and as Affirmations of Statements Within, dated July 9, 2013 (Docket Item 79);
5. Motion for Court to Notify the FBI of Alleged Copyright Infringement by the Defendants and 18 U.S.C. Section 241, 242 & 247 made by Plaintiff and the Court Also to Notify the Attorney General of United States and New ...