United States District Court, N.D. New York
OMAR ABRAMS, Plaintiff, Pro Se, Utica, New York,
DECISION and ORDER
GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge.
Currently before the Court, in the above-captioned pro se civil rights action filed by Omar Abrams ("Plaintiff"), is United States Magistrate Therèse Wiley Dancks' Report-Recommendation recommending Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be dismissed, without further leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 11.)
Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report-Recommendation, and the deadline in which to do so has expired. ( See generally Docket Sheet.)
When no objection is made to a report-recommendation, the Court subjects that report-recommendation to only a clear error review. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes: 1983 Addition. When performing such a "clear error" review, "the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Id .; see also Batista v. Walker, 94-CV-2826, 1995 WL 453299, at *1. (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 1995) (Sotomayor, J.) ("I am permitted to adopt those sections of [a magistrate judge's] report to which no specific objection is made, so long as those sections are not facially erroneous.") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
Here, based on a careful review of this matter, the Court can find no error with Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation, clear or otherwise. (Dkt. No. 11.) Magistrate Judge Dancks employed the proper standards, accurately recited the facts, and reasonably applied the law to those facts. ( Id. ) As a result, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ACCORDINGLY, it is
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 11) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in ...