Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Heberling

Supreme Court of New York, First Department

May 20, 2014

In the Matter of Peter D.W. Heberling, an attorney and counselor-at-law: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Peter D.W. Heberling, Respondent

M--912 - March 31, 2014

Editorial Note:

This decision is subject to revision before publication in the New York reporter.

Jorge Dopico, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee, New York, (Raymond Vallejo, of counsel), for petitioner.

No appearance.

Angela M. Mazzarelli, Justice Presiding, David Friedman, Leland G. DeGrasse, Helen E. Freedman, Barbara R. Kapnick, Justices.

OPINION

Page 91

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department. Respondent, Peter D.W. Heberling, was admitted [986 N.Y.S.2d 331] to the Bar of the State of New York at a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court for the First Judicial Department on March 14, 1977.

Per Curiam

Respondent Peter D.W. Heberling was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on March 14, 1977, and at all times relevant to these proceedings, has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

On March 13, 2013, respondent pleaded guilty in Supreme Court, Bronx County, to one count of attempted dissemination of indecent material to minors in the first degree, in violation of Penal Law § § 110.00 and 235.22, a class E felony.

On October 31, 2013, respondent was sentenced to a period of probation of five years, and required to register as a sex offender, and pay various fees and surcharges.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b) on the ground that he has been automatically disbarred upon his conviction of a felony, as defined by Judiciary Law § 90(4)(e) ( Matter of Chilewich, 20 A.D.3d 109, 795 N.Y.S.2d 232 [1st Dept 2005]; Matter of Weissman, 5 A.D.3d 28, 771 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.