Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hicks v. Bracero

United States District Court, S.D. New York

August 8, 2014

ROBERT HICKS, Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH BRACERO, Shield #173 Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge.

On December 10, 2012, Plaintiff, Robert Hicks, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On January 16, 2013, the Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman for general pretrial proceedings. On December 9, 2013, Defendant, Joseph Bracero, filed a motion to change venue to White Plains. Plaintiff did not file opposition papers. After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Pitman issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R"), proposing that Defendant's motion to change venue to White Plains be granted. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Pitman's R & R in its entirety.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 18 and to transfer the case to White Plains.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.