United States District Court, N.D. New York
JAY H. MORSE, Plaintiff,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
JAY H. MORSE, Riverview Correctional Facility, Ogdensburg, New York, Plaintiff pro se
SANDRA M. GROSSFELD, ESQ., SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF REGIONAL GENERAL COUNSEL, REGION II New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendant.
FREDERICK J. SCULLIN, Jr., Senior District Judge.
On January 13, 2009, Plaintiff "protectively filed" an application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") benefits; and, on March 6, 2009, he filed an application for Social Security disability insurance benefits. After a hearing before an administrative law judge ("ALJ"), the ALJ issued a decision denying benefits. The ALJ's decision became Defendant's final decision when the Appeals Council denied Plaintiff's request for review on September 15, 2012. On December 12, 2012, Plaintiff commenced this action pro se, seeking judicial review of Defendant's final decision. See Dkt. No. 1.
On March 28, 2014, Magistrate Judge Baxter issued a Report-Recommendation, in which he recommended that this Court reverse Defendant's decision and remand this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further evaluation consistent with his report. See Dkt. No. 26 at 20-21. Neither party filed an objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's recommendations.
When a party does not object to a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the court reviews that report-recommendation for clear error or manifest injustice. See Linares v. Mahunik, No. 9:05-CV-625, 2009 WL 3165660, *10 (N.D.N.Y. July 16, 2009) (citation and footnote omitted). After conducting this review, "the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the... recommendations made by the magistrate judge.'" Id. (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)).
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Baxter's March 28, 2014 Report-Recommendation for clear error and manifest injustice; and, finding none, the Court hereby
ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Baxter's March 28, 2014 Report-Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further
ORDERS that Defendant's decision is REVERSED; and the Court further
ORDERS that this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of ...