Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Schoolcraft v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York

August 29, 2014

ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAFT, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

Nathaniel B. Smith, Esq., LAW OFFICE OF NATHANIEL B. SMITH, New York, NY, Attorneys for the Plaintiff.

Ryan G. Shaffer, Esq., MICHAEL A. CARDOZO, CORPORATION COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, New York, NY, Attorneys for the City Defendants.

Gregory John Radomisli, Esq., MARTIN CLEARWATER & BELL LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for Jamaica Hospital Medical Center.

Brian Lee, Esq., IVONE, DEVINE AND JENSEN, LLP, Lake Success, NY, Attorneys for Dr. Isak Isakov.

Mark McAndrew, Esq., VOUTÉ, LOHRFINK, MAGRO & McANDREW LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for non-party Dr. Indira Patel.

OPINION

ROBE SWEET, District Judge.

Discovery disputes have plagued this highly controversial action, perhaps understandably. The letters submitted by Plaintiff Adrian Schoolcraft ("Schoolcraft" or the "Plaintiff") on July 23, July 25, August 5, and August 12, 2014, defendant the City of New York (the "City") on July 29 and August 12, 2014, defendant Dr. Isak Isakov ("Dr. Isakov") on August 5, 2014, defendant Jamaica Hospital Medical Center ("JHMC") on July 24, 2014, and non-party witness Dr. Indira Patel ("Dr. Patel") on July 31, August 14, and August 15, 2014 are being treated as motions to compel discovery and oppositions to such motions.

Prior Proceedings

A detailed recitation of the facts of the case is provided in this Court's opinion dated May 6, 2011. See Schoolcraft v. City of N.Y. , 10 Civ. 6005, 2011 WL 1758635, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 6, 2011). Familiarity with those facts is assumed.

The instant motion concerns several issues related to discovery. Plaintiff has moved for (1) continuation of the deposition of Sergeant Michael Purpi ("Sergeant Purpi"); (2) continuation of the deposition of Dr. Khin Mar Lwin ("Dr. Lwin"); (3) several outstanding documents Plaintiff had requested from the City in discovery; and (4) an order for the counsel representing Dr. Patel to limit his interference in Plaintiff's deposition of Dr. Patel. The City has moved for Plaintiff to update his discovery responses pertaining to his financial and physical/emotional damages. Dr. Isakov has moved to suppress Plaintiff's use of deposition recordings in his current motions regarding the deposition of Dr. Patel.

The Deposition of Sergeant Purpi

The deposition of Sergeant Purpi will be continued for one hour and a half. Short objections may be stated, but the witness will answer all questions other than those to which an objection based on privilege is made.

Document Production

The following documents shall be produced by the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.