United States District Court, N.D. New York
October 15, 2014
WILLIAM G. SCHISLER, SR., Plaintiff,
RONALD RIZIO; and SHERRI RIZIO, Defendants.
WILLIAM G. SCHISLER, SR., Plaintiff, Pro Se, Utica, New York.
DECISION and ORDER
GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge.
Currently before the Court, in this pro se disability discrimination action filed by William G. Schisler, Sr. ("Plaintiff") against the two above-captioned private individuals ("Defendants"), are (1) United States Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks' Report-Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be sua sponte dismissed with prejudice; and (2) Plaintiff's Objection to the Report-Recommendation. (Dkt. Nos. 5, 7.) After carefully reviewing the relevant filings in this action, the Court can find no error in the Report-Recommendation, clear or otherwise: Magistrate Judge Dancks employed the proper standards, accurately recited the facts, and reasonably applied the law to those facts. As a result, the Court accepts and adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein. (Dkt. No. 5.)
ACCORDINGLY, it is
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is sus sponte DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).