Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Obaretin

United States District Court, E.D. New York

November 14, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
UYI OBARETIN, Defendant.

Statement of Reasons Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2)

JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

A sentencing court shall "state in open court the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence." 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). If the sentence is not of the kind prescribed by, or is outside the range of, the Sentencing Guidelines referred to in Section 3553(a)(4), the court shall indicate the specific reasons for imposing a sentence different from the Guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). These "reasons must also be stated with specificity in the written order of judgment and commitment." Id. Even though the mandatory nature of the Guidelines has been excised and they are now "advisory, " see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 245-46 (2005), the sentencing court must still adhere to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). United States v. Jones, 460 F.3d 191, 197 (2d Cir. 2006).

Although a written statement of reasons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) is not necessary when the court imposes a Guidelines sentence, the statement may nevertheless assist the reviewing court and the United States Sentencing Commission in understanding the reasons for the court's sentence.

On October 7, 2014, Mr. Obaretin pled guilty to one count of visa fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a).

On October 28, 2014, Mr. Obaretin was sentenced. The proceeding was videotaped in order to develop an accurate record of the courtroom atmosphere, as well as the factors and considerations that a district court must evaluate in imposing a sentence in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3 553(a). See In re Sentencing, 219 F.R.D. 262, 264-65 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) (describing the value of video recording for the review of sentences on appeal).

II. Offense Level and Category

The adjusted offense level is 6, which includes a 2-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility. The criminal history category is I. The Guidelines range is 0-6 months. U.S.S.G. § 5C1 .1(b). The maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years.

The Guidelines range for supervised release is Ito 3 years. U.S.S.G. § 5131.2(a)(2). The maximum term of supervised release is 3 years. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2).

III. Sentence

Defendant was sentenced to time served of approximately 1.5 months and to 3 years of supervised release, with conditions specified orally at the hearing. A $100 special assessment was imposed. There was no fine and no requirement to pay any costs of prosecution because defendant does not have any assets, and it is unlikely that he will have any in the foreseeable future. The government is instructed to return to the defendant his personal property.

In so ruling, respectful consideration was given to the Sentencing Guidelines, the Sentencing Commission's policy statements, and all other factors listed under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) to ensure that the sentence is "sufficient, but not ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.