United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
March 2, 2015
NATHANIEL GRAVENHISE, Plaintiff,
P.O. ANDREW J. KAMNA et al., Defendants.
NOT FOR ELECTRONIC OR PRINT PUBLICATION
ROSS, United States District Judge:
The court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated February 26, 2015, from the Honorable James Orenstein, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. #13. Plaintiffs counsel has indicated that late plaintiffs mother, his sole heir, does not wish to pursue this claim and does not oppose defendants' proposed motion to dismiss. Dkt. #12. The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); accord Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-1930682 (CBA) (LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Therefore, the case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
February 27, 2014 Brooklyn, New York