United States District Court, N.D. New York
DIMAS CUADRADO, 13-A-3993, Plaintiff, pro se.
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General for the State of New York, Attorney for Defendant.
RACHEL M. KISH, ESQ., Ass't Attorney General.
DECISION and ORDER
DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Dimas Cuadrado brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 17, 2015, the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) be granted. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report-Recommendation.
Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Therefore, it is
1. Defendant Brueault's motion to dismiss is GRANTED;
2. To the extent plaintiff asserts claims against defendant Brueault in his official capacity, those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
3. All remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on plaintiff's failure to fully exhaust administrative remedies;
4. The Central Office Review Committee ("CORC") is directed to render a decision on plaintiff's pending grievance within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order, that is, by May 8, 2015;
5. If plaintiff does not receive a decision from the CORC by May 8, 2015, administrative remedies may be deemed unavailable to him and he may therefore be excused from exhausting;
6. In the event plaintiff does not receive a decision from the CORC by May 8, 2015, he may ...