United States District Court, S.D. New York
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, et al.,
XTREME DRYWALL & ACOUSTICS, INC., Respondent. Petitioners,
OPINION & ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge.
Petitioners seek to confirm an April 3, 2015, arbitration award in their favor against Respondent Xtreme Drywall & Acoustics, Inc. Petitioners also request a grant of attorneys' fees in connection with this proceeding. Respondent has not appeared in this action or otherwise objected to the arbitration award, and its time to do so has passed. For the reasons below, Petitioners' motion to confirm the award and application for attorneys' fees are granted.
The underlying arbitration award arises out of a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA") between Petitioner Funds and Respondent. Respondent was obligated under the CBA to make certain payments on behalf of all of its carpenter employees. The CBA also allowed Petitioners to audit Respondent's records to ensure that the necessary payments had been made. Under the CBA, any disputes or disagreements are subject to final and binding arbitration.
An audit under the terms of the CBA uncovered delinquencies in contributions due between October 29, 2008 and March 8, 2011, totaling $64, 646.78. Petitioners requested the delinquent amount, and when Respondent failed to comply, commenced arbitration proceedings.
At the arbitration, Petitioners sought the delinquent fees, attorneys' fees, arbiter fees, court costs, audit costs, promotional fund fees and outstanding debit memo fees, plus interest. Respondent offered no exceptions to the audit findings, and, according to Petitioners, asserted that it was unable to pay the requested amounts.
The Arbitrator awarded Petitioners a total of $148, 723.00, and 5.25% interest beginning April 3, 2015. On May 23, 2015, Petitioners timely filed a petition (the "Petition") to confirm the arbitration award and obtain attorneys' fees related to the Petition.
II. LEGAL STANDARD
"[T]he court's function in confirming or vacating an arbitration award is severely limited." Willemijn Houdstermaatschappij, BV v. Standard Microsystems Corp., 103 F.3d 9, 12 (2d Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted, alteration in original). "Normally, confirmation of an arbitration award is a summary proceeding that merely makes what is already a final arbitration award a judgment of the court, and the court must grant the award unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected[.]" D.H. Blair & Co., Inc. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 110 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). "[R]eview of an arbitral award by a district court is severely limited so as not unduly to frustrate the goals of arbitration -namely to settle disputes efficiently and avoid long and expensive litigation." Tube City IMS, LLC v. Anza Capital Partners, LLC, 25 F.Supp. 3d 486, 491 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).
An arbitration award should be confirmed as long as there is "a barely colorable justification" for the award. D.H. Blair & Co., 462 F.3d at 110. "The arbitrator's rationale for an award need not be explained, and the award should be confirmed if a ground for the arbitrator's decision can be inferred from the facts of the case." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). "In a case involving a collective bargaining agreement, the Court evaluates whether the arbitrator acted within the scope of his authority, and an award will be confirmed as long as it draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement." Dolan v. Barile Mech., Inc., 933 F.Supp.2d 634, 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (collecting cases) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).
A. The Award
The Petition seeking confirmation is granted.
First, the arbitrator acted within the scope of his authority. The CBA explicitly authorizes the designated arbitrator to render an award which includes, as here, delinquent contributions, interest, liquidated damages, ...