Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Liverpool v. The City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York

January 6, 2020

ANTON F. LIVERPOOL, Plaintiff,
v.
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

          ORDER

          BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.

         Fact discovery having expired on December 20, 2019, without any party requesting an extension (Dkt. No. 63), and neither side having submitted any pre-motion letters regarding summary judgment by the deadline to do so (Dkt. No. 37 ¶ 7), the parties are directed to promptly contact the chambers of the Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge, concerning a schedule for the submission of pro se plaintiff Anton Liverpool's Pretrial Statement and the parties' other pretrial filings.[1]

         The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff pro se.

         SO ORDERED.

         Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge

         Pro Se Office

         United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 230 New York, NY 10007 (212)805-0175

         Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Engelmayer, these Individual Practices apply to all civil pro se cases.

         1. Communications with Chambers

         A. By a Pro Se Party.

         All communications with the Court by a pro se party should be delivered in person or mailed to the Pro Se Office, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Room 200, New York, New York 10007. No. documents or court filings may be sent directly to Chambers. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all communications with the Court will be docketed upon receipt; such docketing shall constitute service on any user of the ECF system. If any other party is not a user of the ECF system (e.g., if there is another pro se party in the case), a pro se party must send copies of any filing to that party and include an Affidavit of Service or other statement affirming that it has done so. Copies of correspondence between a pro se party and opposing parties shall not be sent to the Court, B. By Parties Represented by Counsel.

         Except as otherwise provided below, communications with the Court by a represented party shall be governed by Judge Engelmayer's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, available at http://nvsd.uscourts.gov/iudge/Engelmaver.

         C. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time.

         All requests for adjournments or extensions of time must be made in writing and must state: (1) the original date(s); (2) the number of previous requests for adjournment or extension; (3) whether these previous requests were granted or denied; (4) the reasons for the requested extension; (5) whether the adversary consents and, if not, the reasons given by the adversary for refusing to consent; and (6) the date of the parties' next scheduled appearance before the Court. If the requested adjournment or extension affects any other scheduled dates, a represented party must submit a proposed Revised Scheduling Order in accordance with Judge Furman's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. A pro se party may, but is not required to, submit a proposed Revised Scheduling Order. Requests for extensions of deadlines regarding a matter that has been ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.