Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pacific Controls, Inc. v. Cummins Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York

January 14, 2020

PACIFIC CONTROLS, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
CUMMINS INC., Defendant.

          David S. Pegno DEWEY PEGNO & KRAMARSKY LLP Counsel for Cummins Inc.

          David C. Dreifuss, Counselfor Pacific Controls.

          STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

          Honorable Colleen McMahon, U.S.D.J.

         I. INTRODUCTION

         The parties, by their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(1), hereby stipulate to the following provisions of this Court's Uniform Stipulated Protective Order.

         II. SCOPE OF PROTECTED INFORMATION

         In the course of discovery in this action, the parties may be required to produce information that constitutes, m whole or in part, protected information such as trade secrete, non-public research and development, commercial or financial information, or other information that may cause harm to the producing party or a non-party. The parties anticipate production of the following categories of protected information: trade secrets, names of customers and business partners, sales information, product and manufacturing information, and commercial financial information.

         III. DESIGNATION OF PROTECTED INFORMATION

         A. Scope:

         This Order governs the production and handling of any protected information in this action. Any party or non-party who produces protected information in tins action may designate it as "Confidential" or "Attorneys' Eyes Only" consistent with the terms of this Order. "Designating Party" means the party or non-party who so designates the protected information; "Receiving Party" means the party or non-party to whom such information was produced or disclosed. Whenever possible, the Designating Party must designate only those portions of a document, deposition, transcript, or other material that contain the protected information and refrain from designating entire documents. Regardless of any designations made hereunder, the Designating Party is not otherwise restricted from use or disclosure of its protected information outside of this action. In addition, any party may move to modify or seek other relief from any of the terms of this Order if it has first tried in writing and in good faith to resolve its needs or disputes with the other party(ies) pursuant to the terms of this Order.

         B. Application to Non-Parties:

         Before a non-party is given copies of designated information as permitted hereunder, it must first sign the acknowledgment to be bound to these terms that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; if it fails to do so, the parties to this action must resolve any such dispute before making disclosure of designated information as permitted hereunder to the non-party. If a non-party wishes to make designations hereunder, it must first sign the acknowledgment to be bound to these terms that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

         C. Timing and Provisional Protection:

         Designations may be made at any time. To avoid potential waiver of protection hereunder, the Designating Party should designate information at the time of production or disclosure, including on the record during the taking of any testimony. Deposition testimony will be deemed provisionally protected for a period of 30 days after the transcript is released to the parties by the court reporter, although the parties may agree at any time to different timelines of provisional protection of information as Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only as part of one or more specific depositions. To retain any designations beyond the provisional period, a Designating Party must designate specific pages and lines of deposition testimony before the provisional period has expired. Such designations must be made in writing so that all counsel and court reporters may append the designation to all copies of the transcripts.

         D. Manner of Designation:

         Information may be designated hereunder in any reasonable manner or method that notifies the Receiving Party of the designation level and identifies with specificity the information to which the designation applies. If made verbally, the Designating Party must promptly confirm in writing the designation. Whenever possible, the Designating Party should stamp, affix, or embed a legend of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.